Scaling Science: The Strategic Evolution of Lab Consolidation


Across Australia's life sciences landscape, a quiet revolution is taking place. The emergence of "Super Labs" and centralised hubs signals a fundamental rethinking of how scientific infrastructure should be organised in a post-pandemic world. This consolidation trend offers enticing benefits but also introduces new challenges that must be carefully considered.


As R&D investment accelerates and competition for premium space intensifies, organisations are increasingly questioning the distributed model that has defined scientific facilities for decades. The math is compelling: multiple leases, duplicate equipment, operational costs and fragmented teams all add complexity and cost at a time when efficiency has never been more critical.

Research from the nonprofit, independent organization APQC indicates that centralised organisations have manufacturing costs approximately 3% lower than those of decentralised companies. For a company with annual revenues of $5 billion, this difference translates to a substantial $150 million in savings.

BVAQ's consolidation of six separate leases into their West Melbourne facility, now Australia's largest food testing laboratory, exemplifies this trend.

BVAQ's consolidation of six separate leases into their West Melbourne facility, now Australia's largest food testing laboratory, exemplifies this trend. Similarly, rumours have sparked about a life sciences organisation ambitiously repurposing the former Costco site, demonstrating how organisations are reimagining existing infrastructure to create integrated scientific ecosystems.

The allure of these scientific hubs extends beyond simple cost calculations. Operational synergies emerge through streamlined workflows and dramatically improved utilisation rates of high-value assets. When researchers and technical teams share physical space, the informal exchanges that spark innovation become routine rather than exceptional, potentially accelerating breakthrough moments. Consolidated facilities also enable unified regulatory approaches and simplified audit trails, addressing the notorious challenges of maintaining consistent quality systems across multiple sites.

Purpose-built or thoughtfully retrofitted hubs can incorporate the adaptability that scientific organisations desperately need in an era of rapid technological change. With sustainability now a strategic imperative, these facilities offer tangible pathways to reduced energy consumption and smaller carbon footprints.

Yet for all their promise, the Super Lab model introduces its own set of complexities. The upfront investment required can be prohibitive, particularly when specialised infrastructure and compliance requirements are factored in. Centralising operations, also creates a single point of vulnerability that must be carefully mitigated. Stringent business continuity plans ensuring redundancies need to be factored including equipment failures, labor strikes, or natural disasters.

As facilities scale, so too does operational complexity, from equipment scheduling to material flows, requiring sophisticated management systems. Australia's vast geography means that centralisation inevitably distances some operations from their customers, suppliers, or regional stakeholders. Making it not suitable for all business models. Consolidation projects also risk losing institutional knowledge when staff cannot or will not relocate to new hub locations.

This explains why organisations like ALS Environmental maintain their hub-and-spoke approach, balancing centralisation benefits with the resilience and market responsiveness that distributed models provide.

The most sophisticated players in this space recognise that the choice between consolidation and distribution isn't binary. Instead, they're developing nuanced strategies that combine centralised core operations with strategic satellite facilities, creating resilience while still capturing efficiency gains.

The opportunities of consolidation: how consolidation improves ways of working and the corresponding return on investment

As Australia's life sciences sector continues its extraordinary growth trajectory, the organisations that thrive will be those that move beyond simplistic models, crafting infrastructure strategies that balance immediate operational needs with long-term flexibility in an increasingly uncertain world.

Want support with a scenario assessment for your business’ size and locations?

The Connected strategic team are here to support.

Previous
Previous

Office-to-Lab Conversions: What You Need to Know

Next
Next

The Great Manufacturing Pivot: How US Tariffs Are Opening Doors for Australian Innovation